PREVIOUS WORK

Search

How we lost faith/ the path to god pt 2

How we lost faith


In this essay, I will describe what divinity is and how it is represented in many areas of

thought. How recognition of that which we consider divine develops into religion using a

philosophical argument around the hard problem of consciousness.

Then I will propose that through time religion got confused and became the basis for

thinking about the divine and that through this faith has been lost.


Religion is an attempt at describing that which is divine in the universe.


That which is divine is that which we experience emotionally, phenomenologically and

sometimes through direct experience. Some cultures pay homage in an attempt to

experience the divine through dance and ritual. Shamans and psychedelic explorers alike,

try to induce altered states in consciousness to attempt to go inwards to that which is

considered divine. Some traditions such as yoga spend a lifetime of inward

phenomenological study and practice to connect with it. Psychologists like Carl Jung have

attempted to map a similar process via what he calls individuation and recognizes the divine

in the collective unconscious and archetypal symbolism.

Many people consider love divine. Or even the ability to love (consciousness), as we

express it, as humans, is divine. The philosopher whitehead considers experience and ideas

as divine as they are delivered to us from the world, we do not conjecture about them first.

He expresses this as such “a young man does not initiate his experience by dancing with

impressions of sensation and then proceed to conjecture with a partner, the man is first of all

in contact with his dancing partner and only afterward... formulates skeptical epistemic

conjectures about his partner’s status as a collection of colorful shapes projected upon his

retina”.


The above, I hope, people do not have massive disagreements with. Many people through

the simple act of love can find divinity within it. But when this love is a gift from God, a

miracle from the big floating man in the sky. People scoff. But what is a religion if not an

attempt at comprehending that which is divine? The question I will tackle soon, why is it if

people lose faith in religion they lose faith in considering anything divine?

Religion then is an attempt at describing that which is divine. It is an approach to

understanding those very first interactions that seem so divine upon the first experience.

Within these first interactions, the divinity has been found to be an all-pervasive feature

within the universe. There are many paths to the recognition of this all-pervasive feature or

connectedness/unity that is often hinted at within the universe. I will describe one of them

through philosophical means.

The first step comes in what is known as the hard problem of consciousness. The hard

problem of consciousness is why do sentient beings, such as me and you have conscious

states of happiness or pain and experience of qualia (colour, sharpness etc).

Part of the problem comes from the fact that we are seemingly made up of non-sentient

physical parts but have a property that them parts do not have

how is it that X --> Y (Y comes from X) but Y contains something that X does not.


While it may be possible to explain all of the physical processes and why we react the way

we do to the environment why is everything we do accompanied by a feeling of experience?

One possibility is that consciousness is actually part of the physical constituents that make

up reality. This idea is called pan-psychism. Pan-psychism essentially states that X, as in the

previous example, does have the properties of experience and that Y (sentient beings) is a

collection of these conscious building blocks that constitutes something that can experience.

Pan-psychism does have it's own problems. For example the combination problem. Why is it

then that our specific combination of atoms and neurons in the brain gives rise to

experience. Why, does something like the sun not seem to experience things. That is, after

all, a large collection of supposedly conscious atoms.

The step here can then be to bite the bullet and adopt Whitehead's pan-experientialism

which is the same as pan-psychism except the pervasive feature in everything is not

consciousness, it is an experience itself. The concept then is that experience is a pervasive

feature throughout the macro-micro processes composing the world. Whitehead when

attempting to explain these things draws to certain phenomenons in nature such as

Spatio-temporal relativity, quantum non-locality and self-organization in cells.

What I have tried to highlight here is one line of philosophical thinking that is attempting to

highlight what the divine could be in the universe. Is the divine this all-pervasive

consciousness/experience that is fundamental in everything? When yogis dedicate their lives

to connecting with the universe is this what they are connecting with. Is Jung's collective

unconscious the very same feature. Can it be simple to say that this all-pervasive feature is

love?

Perhaps I am jumping ahead of myself, without in-depth explanations of such theories it is

likely these words will fall on deaf ears. However, belief in such a feature does not take you

far away from pantheism, if divinity is recognizable by us all is it not all-pervasive? And if the

universe is connected through experience is that very far from saying god and the universe

are one?

Just as I have tried through one philosophical path to grasp at the divine in an explanation,

so does religion. Religion goes one step further than pantheism, after recognition of the

divine into pantheistic thinking questions arise as to, why are we connected in such a way?

is this connectedness part of a purpose, was this divine connectedness created by a higher

power? Does this higher power have a consciousness like ours? Is it all-powerful? If it did

create everything, why did it do it?

Thus religion is born out of divinity. But somewhere along the way ideas got confused,

religion became its own entity. It became a practice, a political tool, and a weapon. Through

these changes, divinity was lost in religion. Religion went through structural transition after

transition until finally when Nietzsche recognised that any structure had been dissolved

completely he declared religion dead. It had in fact been turned upside down. Religion

somehow has been placed as the building block to divinity and with this, the separation of

the two was finally complete. Theists like Richard Dawkins thus no need no longer argue

from a phenomenological basis as to why there is no divinity in the universe. They merely

need to disprove the metaphorical thinking that religion had last left us with. Let me remind

you of what was said earlier, we first experience the world through interaction, interacting

with the divine and turning this into mythology and stories. From here we develop it into

more comprehensive thought. But now, our foundation has been flipped and religious

mythology is the foundation for thinking about the divine, not the other way round. All that is

left to do is to disprove the mythology and you disprove everything.

Religion, or theology as I should more accurately be using, was creating a mythology to help

understand questions such as did a higher power create our divine-connectedness? But

when this description is precisely at the stage of mythology and this mythology, is now the

building block for divine thought, you only have to disprove the mythology as is so commonly

done. The people who are left believing religion then, have their faith only in the

metaphorical floating man in the sky, who casts miracles. Not in the divine nature that led to

this mythological thought. Unfortunately, it is true that religion is so lost that a lot of believers

have not gone through the process of experiencing the divine in any sense, religion is now

often taught from the mythology up to the divine. Because of this faith is so easily lost. Faith

comes from the feeling of divinity. Kierkegaard's knight of faith is precisely one that is in

touch with the divine in the universe. His knight of faith “takes delight in everything he sees,

in the human swarm, in the new omnibuses, in the water of sound... He is interested in

everything that goes on”

Faith needs to be restored. Perhaps firstly religion needs to be understood in terms of a

description of the divine. Perhaps religion is not what is needed in these times. But with the

nihilistic age of anxiety and depression that we have entered into especially in the western

world maybe we need to take a simpler approach to go back to experiencing the world. We

must go back to dancing with our partners and conjecturing with what this experience means

to us. The divine does not have to be understood as something given from a higher power.

The divine is that new interaction and how you experience it.

51 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

This is a more casual follow up to a previous essay I wrote. Reading and understanding it is not necessary but it would add depth to this article. The essay can be found here: https://www.publish0x.co